“Electric power is everywhere present in unlimited quantities and can drive the world’s machinery without the need of coal, oil, gas, or any other of the common fuels.” – Nikola Tesla

I believe that several free-energy devices that appear to have drawn energy from disintegration of matter into energy, as described in the group description, only a few researchers realized how to efficiently convert it into electrical current and even fewer people actually knew where the power was being extracted from. People, whom I will not name, have been disseminating information for years that is far removed from the reality of radiant energy power generation, covering it up with deceptive theories. It is time to set the record straight and put the lame theories to rest forever. They have done a terrible disservice to humanity.
The real shocker in the course of my research came to me when I discovered early 1900 patents that show that Moray was not the original inventor of the “radiant energy receiver.” The patents had remained hidden because the inventor shortened his name when he immigrated to America. This served well over the years to protect the invention from prying eyes.
The patents represent a crude but functional radiant energy power device. Adding the “Swedish Stone” detector to the circuit was Moray’s actual contribution to the device, increasing the efficiency of conversion several-fold. The two men worked together until Moray passed away in May 1974. The patents have been added to the group file. With these patents it will become possible for you to build a radiant energy power generator that is both self-sustaining and will also provide useful electrical power.

Bruce Perreault Claims “Pre-Glow Discharge Between Electrodes” to be His Intellectual Property

From: “Bruce A. Perreault” <nuenergy@cyberportal.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 08:05:03 -0500
Subject: From my copyrighted and registered book – To Steve Elswick
Steve,

The enclosed text proves that the pre glow between electrodes is my original findings. All others that write about this effect in over unity or free energy devices and do not give me credit are thieves and do not have an ounce of integrity.

I will be demonstrating radiant energy proof of concept hardware at Inventors Weekend this year.

-Bruce

Pages 35 – 36 (revised 2003 edition) First edition was printed and registered with the copyright office in 1996.

A shared provisional patent was also shared with a former virtual lab assistant from Australia.

There appears to be a common thread shared between several alternative energy devices. It is the pre-glow discharge. The report on the Hans Coler device released by the British Government indicates that there is excess energy released when electrical contacts are opened and closed. The Lester Hendershot device utilized a buzzer circuit that opened and closed its electrical contacts. In the Alfred Hubbard coil pre-glow discharge flowed through electrical contacts, a distributor cap and radium soaked spark plug. The Joseph Newman motor used a sparking commutator. Thomas Moray invented a glowing, cold cathode discharge tube that was the heart of his radiant energy generator. Hermann Plauson was granted U.S. Patent No. 1,540,998 that used spark gaps to convert atmospheric energy. Frank Wyatt Prentice was granted Canadian Patent No. 253,765 that detailed his invention, which lighted 50 sixty-watt carbon lamps with an input of only 500 watts. His invention utilized a spark gap driven high frequency tuned resonant system. Chancy Britten used pre-glow ion valves constructed with a central wire that was surround by a coil of wire which is described in his US Patent No. 1,826,727. Britten’s valve was said to have lit up his home in the 1930’s according to a local newspaper article of that time period. Alexander Chernetski experimented with what appears to have been a type of ion-valve that was filled with hydrogen gas. It is said that he got up to five times more energy out of his device than what he put into it. Edwin Gray was granted U.S. Patent No. 3,890,548 for his efficient spark gap driven capacitive-discharge motor. He improved on this patent by replacing the spark gap with a pre-glow discharge switching tube. His U.S. Patents No. 4,595,975 and No. 4,661,747 describes this tube in detail. Gray’s patents claim to conserve battery power by sending unused energy back to the supply batteries. Gray thought that counter-electromotive force was solely responsible for recharging the batteries in his system. Radiant energy was generated during the pre-glow discharge cycle that also contributed to recharging the batteries. Paulo N. Correa and Alexander N. Correa obtained patents to their pre-glow discharge system that recovered energy and recharged a battery.

A pre-glow discharge generates radiant energy. The wattage produced will depend largely on the type of electrode materials that are used. I do not suspect that the above referenced inventors knew that their systems were generating and feeding back energy to their respective circuits.

According to the “sea electron model” metals are bonded to each other through electron sharing. In the embodiment in Figure 4 the negative charge on the wire negatively ionizes any gas that contacts it. These ions rush towards the positively charged cylinder. When an ion that carries an excess electron hits head-on with a positively charged metal atom the electron combines with atoms of the metal. The electron that is absorbed by the metal atom passes along its kinetic energy. This causes the metal atom to oscillate generating a photon burst. When ultraviolet photons are generated and impinge upon atoms some of these atoms are dissociated and excess electrons are released. The sea electron model helps to explain this effect. The model suggests that metal atoms be bathed in a sea of valence electrons. If this model is taken one step further it can be seen that when metallic atoms are dissociated from each other excess electrons are released in the form of raw electrical energy. This occurs because the electrons no longer take part in the inter-atomic binding force that existed before the disintegration took place. It becomes clear that impinging photons break the binding force between the inter-atomic structure. The freed electrons will add amperage to the output circuit to which it is connected. Henceforth, the equation I x E = P holds true in this system. Where, “I” represents the electrons (amperage), “E” electromotive force (ionic voltage), and “P” the power generated.

From: “Bruce A. Perreault” <nuenergy@cyberportal.net>
To: “Sterling D. Allan” <sterlingda@greaterthings.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:58 AM
Subject: Re: Bruce Perreault Claims “Pre-Glow Between Electrodes” to be His Intellectual Property

Sterling,

Please add this post to the article that you
have posted…

http://www.greaterthings.com/News/FreeEnergy/Directory/
Perreault/pre-glow_electrodes.htm

Pre Glow Discharge Credit Clarification

Hello Everyone!

Please do not misunderstand me… I want to make it clear that I am NOT claiming that anyone who has a glow between electrodes is taking credit from me. In fact… Igor Alexeff invented a glow discharge tube to control the power surges of a closing switch U.S. Patent No. 4,291,255. This patent comes close to what my ion valve does but it is not the same. There are others that I mention in my recent book that utilized pre glow discharges in their inventions as well. I have clearly given credit to these fine inventors. Specifically, the credit that is due to me is my finding that under the proper configurations and in the correct pre glow discharge environment more electrons can be released than what is required to trigger the release. This release of energy attains a high frequency oscillation that is indicative of the metal or metals involved in its release. T. H. Moray called this “Radiant Energy”. No other person to date has made the correlation in regards to the release of high frequency energy from metals and semi conductors and to the identification of the mechanism in the pre glow discharge that leads to this release of energy. This is what I stake my claim to. I also stake claims to a number of practical alternative energy circuits that utilize my unique findings. I hope that I have cleared the air today.

* I can not respond to response posts at this time.

-Bruce A. Perreault

Source: http://freeenergynews.com/Directory/Perreault/pre-glow_electrodes.htm

Source: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/radiant_energy