You are currently browsing the daily archive for November 27th, 2008.

From PESWiki

Page first featured Nov. 2, 2008

Magnetromapparata
The magnetromapparata was invented in 1933 primarily by Captain Hans Coler of Germany. The device required no apparent outside power sources to function. It involved magnets to generate electricity without any source of input power other than the space energy of Nature’s quantum invisible world.

It was denied patent protection by the German Patent Office as being a perpetual motion device. It was ignored, and the records relating to it were buried in hidden archives, possibly because the scientists who had to pass judgement could not understand the physical reason why the invention actually worked.

A 70 Watt prototype was built, and a company formed: Coler Gmbh. Later a 5 kilowatt devices was built which allegedly powered Coler’s house and laboratory for three years.

Official interest was shown by heads of the German navy who felt an investigation was necessary, and an official report was produced. A highly secret Nazi effort apparently had the goal of using his invention to recharge submarine batteries, without the need for the sub to surface. Experts examined the device and could find no fraud. It was judged Coler was an honest experimenter, but no expert opinion was forth coming as to how the unit operated. It was put under Official Secrecy after its operation had been verified by Government scientists. (Reference: Magnetic Power, Inc)

Contents

[hide]

Official Website

None, as the inventor died long ago, and no one entity is continuing the company work as its legal successor, that we know of.

How it Works

The Magnetstromapparat

The Magnetstromapparat consisted of six permanent magnets wound so that the circuit includes the magnet itself as well as the windings. These six magnet-coils are arranged in a hexagon and connected in a circuit that includes two small condensers, a switch and a pair of solenoid coils, one sliding inside the other. To operate the device, the switch is left open, the magnets are moved slightly apart, and the sliding coils set into various positions. After the appropriate adjustments, at a critical separation of the magnets, an indicator appears on the voltmeter. The switch is then closed and the adjustments continue. Tension builds to a maximum and should then remain indefinitely. The greatest tension obtained was stated to be 12 volts.

Scoler-winding-500.jpg

The Stromerzeuger

The apparatus consists of three principle circuits which are inter-wound and intercoupled (verkoppelt) in a peculiar way. Some of these are divided again into single subsidiary circuits which evidently have all to be brought into resonance with one another.

The principle circuits (called the anchor) in which the energy gain probably occurs, consists of metal plates between which transformer coils are connected, the whole being connected to one large plate coil (Plattenspule).

On each of the single windings on this is coupled a large flat coil (Flachspule) (called field).

These flat coils are interwoven in two groups, these groups represent the turns of a transformer.

This couples, on one hand on the flat coils of the other group (as secondary coils), and on the other hand on the anchor-plate coil, which is placed between them.

The third electrically independent circuit (called the directing circuit) (Steuerkreis) regulates this transference.

This basic diagram shows the conditions necessary for self-interruption.

In consequence of this arrangement, different types of current are created in different conductors (pulsed direct current, alternating current, etc.)
The transformer coils, connected between the anchor plates, are connected in a peculiar way through thin permanent magnet rods. Their main object seems to be to pre-magnetize the transformer cores, it is, however, very probable that they are also connected with the Barckhausen effect, also shown by JLN Labs.

1. The basic principle is that an electron is to be regarded not only as a negatively charged particle but also as a South magnetic pole.

The basic element is that of an open secondary circuit, capacity loaded, inductively coupled to a primary circuit. The novel feature is that the capacities are connected to the secondary core through permanent magnets, as shown.

It is claimed that, on switching on the primary circuit, “separation of charges” takes place, i.e M1 becomes + vely charged and M2 – vely charged, and that these charges are “magnetically polorised” when they formed, owing to the presence of the magnets.

On switching off the primary circuit a “reversing current” flows in the secondery, but the magnets “do not exert a polarising effect on this reversal”

2. Two of these basic elements are now placed together making a double system or stage with the plates close together in parallel planes as shown:

The secondary windings are both exactly equal and wound in a direction such that on switching on the primary coil the electrons in the secondary coil flow from P1 to P2 and F1 to F2.

It is then stated that system F1 – F2 merely has an inducing effect, and the useful current comes into existence in the system P1 -P2.

3. A single stage cannot be effective but two stages connected so that the numbers of effective North and South poles are equal will provide a basic working arrangement.

More double stages can then be added to provide higher outputs.

4. It is then stated that as well as the normal electrons flowing from the battery and induction when the circuit is opened or closed “space electrons” flow from “repelling spaces” to “attracting spaces” between the plates.

Pictures

Coler-magnetstrom-apparat 400.jpg

Videos

(5.46 Minutes) Steven Mark solid state generator

  • This device is a variant and the successor to the “Magnetstromapparat” and the “Stromerzeuger” (= Magnet Current Apparatus / Electricity Generator; see the Coler Report). It is NOT dependent on earths magnetic field, can operate everywhere, without fuel and without moving parts. As the magnetic field is rotating in itself, the power can be increased considerably by increasing the “rotating” frequency and when we will be able to use superconductors at room temperature. (YouTube; July 19, 2008)

- – - -

(6.41 Minutes) Hans Coler Experiments

  • Hans Coler claims the electron is a south pole. Physics teaches us the electron is a small magnet containing a north and south pole. Some test on the Hans Coler claim. (YouTube; July 06, 2007)

- – - -

(2.52 Minutes) Hans Coler Experiments 2
(YouTube; July 06, 2007)

History

The “Magnetstromapparat” was developed by Captain Hans Coler and Fritz Von Unruh early in 1933, and they were later assisted by Franz Haid of Siemens-Schukert, who built himself a model that worked in December 1933. Coler stated that the strength of the magnets did not decrease during use of the apparatus; and suggested that he was tapping a new sort of energy hitherto unknown. — “Raumenergie” (Space-Energy).

In 1933 Coler and von Unruh made up a slightly larger model with an output of 70 watts. This was demonstrated to Dr. F. Modersohn, who obtained from Schumann and Kloss confirmation of their tests in 1926. Modershon then consented to back the invention, and formed a company (Coler G.m.b.h.) to continue the development.

Modersohn´s connection with Rhein- metall Borsig, and hence with the official Hermann Goering combine gave him an advantage in this. Coler then in 1937 built for the Company a larger version with an output of six kilowatts. He claimed it powered his house and laboratory for three years. This led in 1943 to support by the German Navy. A highly secret Nazi effort apparently had the goal of using his invention to recharge submarine batteries, without the need for the sub to surface.

Patents

Profiles

Inventor: Captain Hans Coler

Coverage

Directories

In the News

  • Featured: Solid State Generators >
    Hans Coler Magnetic Power Apparatus – The “magnetromapparata” was invented in 1933 primarily by Captain Hans Coler of Germany. The device required no apparent outside power sources to function. It involved magnets to generate electricity without any source of input power other than the space energy of Nature’s quantum invisible world. (PESWiki; Nov. 2, 2008)

  • Hans Coler – Why We May Never Have Needed Nuclear Power – A well-supported effort to follow up the British Report, that concluded the Coler work was real, might have prevented the launching of the nuclear power industry and its inevitable link to nuclear weapons programs disguised as power plant development. The current examples are, of course, Iran and North Korea. (Renewable Energy World; March 28, 2008)

Other Coverage

Source: http://peswiki.com/index.php/Directory:Hans_Coler_Magnetic_Power_Apparatus

“Electric power is everywhere present in unlimited quantities and can drive the world’s machinery without the need of coal, oil, gas, or any other of the common fuels.”Nikola Tesla

I believe that several free-energy devices that appear to have drawn energy from disintegration of matter into energy, as described in the group description, only a few researchers realized how to efficiently convert it into electrical current and even fewer people actually knew where the power was being extracted from. People, whom I will not name, have been disseminating information for years that is far removed from the reality of radiant energy power generation, covering it up with deceptive theories. It is time to set the record straight and put the lame theories to rest forever. They have done a terrible disservice to humanity.
The real shocker in the course of my research came to me when I discovered early 1900 patents that show that Moray was not the original inventor of the “radiant energy receiver.” The patents had remained hidden because the inventor shortened his name when he immigrated to America. This served well over the years to protect the invention from prying eyes.
The patents represent a crude but functional radiant energy power device. Adding the “Swedish Stone” detector to the circuit was Moray’s actual contribution to the device, increasing the efficiency of conversion several-fold. The two men worked together until Moray passed away in May 1974. The patents have been added to the group file. With these patents it will become possible for you to build a radiant energy power generator that is both self-sustaining and will also provide useful electrical power.

Bruce Perreault Claims “Pre-Glow Discharge Between Electrodes” to be His Intellectual Property

From: “Bruce A. Perreault” <nuenergy@cyberportal.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2003 08:05:03 -0500
Subject: From my copyrighted and registered book – To Steve Elswick
Steve,

The enclosed text proves that the pre glow between electrodes is my original findings. All others that write about this effect in over unity or free energy devices and do not give me credit are thieves and do not have an ounce of integrity.

I will be demonstrating radiant energy proof of concept hardware at Inventors Weekend this year.

-Bruce

Pages 35 – 36 (revised 2003 edition) First edition was printed and registered with the copyright office in 1996.

A shared provisional patent was also shared with a former virtual lab assistant from Australia.

There appears to be a common thread shared between several alternative energy devices. It is the pre-glow discharge. The report on the Hans Coler device released by the British Government indicates that there is excess energy released when electrical contacts are opened and closed. The Lester Hendershot device utilized a buzzer circuit that opened and closed its electrical contacts. In the Alfred Hubbard coil pre-glow discharge flowed through electrical contacts, a distributor cap and radium soaked spark plug. The Joseph Newman motor used a sparking commutator. Thomas Moray invented a glowing, cold cathode discharge tube that was the heart of his radiant energy generator. Hermann Plauson was granted U.S. Patent No. 1,540,998 that used spark gaps to convert atmospheric energy. Frank Wyatt Prentice was granted Canadian Patent No. 253,765 that detailed his invention, which lighted 50 sixty-watt carbon lamps with an input of only 500 watts. His invention utilized a spark gap driven high frequency tuned resonant system. Chancy Britten used pre-glow ion valves constructed with a central wire that was surround by a coil of wire which is described in his US Patent No. 1,826,727. Britten’s valve was said to have lit up his home in the 1930’s according to a local newspaper article of that time period. Alexander Chernetski experimented with what appears to have been a type of ion-valve that was filled with hydrogen gas. It is said that he got up to five times more energy out of his device than what he put into it. Edwin Gray was granted U.S. Patent No. 3,890,548 for his efficient spark gap driven capacitive-discharge motor. He improved on this patent by replacing the spark gap with a pre-glow discharge switching tube. His U.S. Patents No. 4,595,975 and No. 4,661,747 describes this tube in detail. Gray’s patents claim to conserve battery power by sending unused energy back to the supply batteries. Gray thought that counter-electromotive force was solely responsible for recharging the batteries in his system. Radiant energy was generated during the pre-glow discharge cycle that also contributed to recharging the batteries. Paulo N. Correa and Alexander N. Correa obtained patents to their pre-glow discharge system that recovered energy and recharged a battery.

A pre-glow discharge generates radiant energy. The wattage produced will depend largely on the type of electrode materials that are used. I do not suspect that the above referenced inventors knew that their systems were generating and feeding back energy to their respective circuits.

According to the “sea electron model” metals are bonded to each other through electron sharing. In the embodiment in Figure 4 the negative charge on the wire negatively ionizes any gas that contacts it. These ions rush towards the positively charged cylinder. When an ion that carries an excess electron hits head-on with a positively charged metal atom the electron combines with atoms of the metal. The electron that is absorbed by the metal atom passes along its kinetic energy. This causes the metal atom to oscillate generating a photon burst. When ultraviolet photons are generated and impinge upon atoms some of these atoms are dissociated and excess electrons are released. The sea electron model helps to explain this effect. The model suggests that metal atoms be bathed in a sea of valence electrons. If this model is taken one step further it can be seen that when metallic atoms are dissociated from each other excess electrons are released in the form of raw electrical energy. This occurs because the electrons no longer take part in the inter-atomic binding force that existed before the disintegration took place. It becomes clear that impinging photons break the binding force between the inter-atomic structure. The freed electrons will add amperage to the output circuit to which it is connected. Henceforth, the equation I x E = P holds true in this system. Where, “I” represents the electrons (amperage), “E” electromotive force (ionic voltage), and “P” the power generated.


From: “Bruce A. Perreault” <nuenergy@cyberportal.net>
To: “Sterling D. Allan” <sterlingda@greaterthings.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:58 AM
Subject: Re: Bruce Perreault Claims “Pre-Glow Between Electrodes” to be His Intellectual Property

Sterling,

Please add this post to the article that you
have posted…

http://www.greaterthings.com/News/FreeEnergy/Directory/
Perreault/pre-glow_electrodes.htm

Pre Glow Discharge Credit Clarification

Hello Everyone!

Please do not misunderstand me… I want to make it clear that I am NOT claiming that anyone who has a glow between electrodes is taking credit from me. In fact… Igor Alexeff invented a glow discharge tube to control the power surges of a closing switch U.S. Patent No. 4,291,255. This patent comes close to what my ion valve does but it is not the same. There are others that I mention in my recent book that utilized pre glow discharges in their inventions as well. I have clearly given credit to these fine inventors. Specifically, the credit that is due to me is my finding that under the proper configurations and in the correct pre glow discharge environment more electrons can be released than what is required to trigger the release. This release of energy attains a high frequency oscillation that is indicative of the metal or metals involved in its release. T. H. Moray called this “Radiant Energy”. No other person to date has made the correlation in regards to the release of high frequency energy from metals and semi conductors and to the identification of the mechanism in the pre glow discharge that leads to this release of energy. This is what I stake my claim to. I also stake claims to a number of practical alternative energy circuits that utilize my unique findings. I hope that I have cleared the air today.

* I can not respond to response posts at this time.

-Bruce A. Perreault

Source: http://freeenergynews.com/Directory/Perreault/pre-glow_electrodes.htm

Source: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/radiant_energy

Blog Stats

  • 131,753 hits

 

November 2008
M T W T F S S
« Oct   Dec »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

SocialVibe