A businessman and inventor, who desires anonymity for the moment, has revealed the design of a chain driven gravity machine that allegedly requires no input power. He claims it has been proven to work, providing 1.5 kW from 300 kg of weights.
by Hank Mills with Sterling D. Allan
Pure Energy Systems News
Over the years there have been countless inventors who have claimed to build working gravity machines. These machines are typically claimed to produce free energy, by somehow harnessing the force of gravity to produce work.
Now, an inventor and businessman, who has wished to remain anonymous for the moment, has come forward releasing a design for a chain driven gravity device.
To look at it, immediately gives the impression: “That just might work!”
(rotates counterclockwise)
Cognitively, this one doesn’t make sense to most of us. Where does the energy come from? Don’t you have to first elevate something in order to harness gravity? But to look at the above image, you think that this certainly illustrates a way to do it.
Could this be the open source project we’ve all been waiting for: something that is simple, affordable, produces practical amounts of power, and is not encumbered by intellectual property claims?
Our associate claims to know of at least three people who built and tested the device to show that it does indeed work; and he added some improvements himself using simulation software. “This system, we have checked it, it 100% works.”
The device is not his original idea, and he claims to only be passing it along so people can prove to themselves gravity machines can work.
Although he is working primarily on other systems that he asserts are more advanced, he claims the chain driven gravity device can be used by people to prove to themselves that such systems are possible. Breaking the mental block against such systems is to his advantage so that by the time his more advanced technology is ready to hit the market, people will be more open to it.
In a Skype chat on Tuesday with Sterling, he said that 300 kilograms of combined weights resulted in an output of 1.5 kW of power. He didn’t seem to think that was very impressive compared to the megawatts he’s anticipating from his design. I don’t know about you, but I think 1.5 kW from 300 kilos of weights would be about the best thing going right now.
In order to allow people to convince themselves that “not all such systems are bogus or scams”, he has allowed us at PES Network to post the above diagram showing the basic concept and operation of the device.
The basic idea of the device seems fairly strait forward. There are two cogs in a vertical arrangement mounted on bearings, so each can spin freely. The top cog has larger spacing than the bottom one of same diameter, and contains extensions, gear teeth, or short arms of some kind. The lower cog contains a greater number of hook-like extensions.
A chain composed of a large number of links (he describes them as being similar to links in a bicycle chain) are connected around the two cogs. When the system is allowed to operate, the difference between the cogs — apparently due to a gearing effect — creates an imbalance of chain links on one side. This produces an unbalanced load, so there is more weight on one side than the other. The result of this unbalanced load is alleged to be continuous rotation that can be harnessed to produce “free energy.”
Not shown in the above diagram is a set of walls that are used on each side of the ascending and descending chains, to keep them in line and at a given width. There is also a wall that goes around the bottom to help keep the chain from falling off the cogs, which have a small hook on them as well. The rollers connecting the chain links need to be able to rotate to allow movement along the walls.
He describes this system as being super simple and easy to replicate.
He said there are a couple disadvantages to the system. One disadvantage is that it requires a large mass for a relatively low amount of power output (compared to his more advanced systems). Another disadvantage to this system that it is slow, due to depending on the constant force of gravity, unlike centrifugal force which increases as a square of the speed. This creates a speed limitation for the device.
Also, it is important to use very good bearings on this device, because there is a huge radial load on them. Good bearings will make the system last longer, and increase the output.
It is asserted to be simple to create electricity with this device. All you would have to do is attach a generator to one of the spinning cogs. The mechanical power would then be converted into electricity.
One good aspect of this device is that it does not need any input power. You do not need a drive motor to get it going. The force of gravity does all the work. Another advantage I can think of is that no magnets or expensive materials would be needed. If the chain links were made very wide, I’m thinking a large hunk of cheap lead could be installed in them to add weight. There are also many ways this system could be altered, but still use the same principle.
You would regulate the speed by exerting a braking action on the rotation.
Here are a few quotes from the Skype call he had with Sterling.
| “About 300 kilo weight machine will make about one and a half kilowatts power, but it is slow. It is speed of the gravity. And if you look at it, one side the bottom links that it is a smaller cog, and the back side of the chain is like a bearing, like a roller… like on a bicycle chain where the links are is a roll able thing. So there are hooks on the smaller one, and on the back, on the top, is a wider cog. So what happens is it expanded one side, and one side falls. The falling side always folds together and gets heavier, and the lifting side is opened up, is lighter.” |
If this setup works, it could be a useful tool to prove that free energy is possible, and that gravity machines can indeed work. If gravity machines can be proven to work, then the next stage is to show that centrifugal force based machines can also produce free energy.
We’ve created a PESWiki feature page to house this open source project, where we can post diagrams, materials lists, cautions, instructions, replications, data, improvement suggestions, forum links, news links. Remember, PESWiki is publicly editable, and we would appreciate help in maintaining the accuracy, clarity, and timeliness of the pages associated with this project. Due to spam, we had to disable the sign-up function for new users, so just drop us an email if you want to be able to edit the site.
We’ve also created a forum for those who wish to be involved in this project. Of course we ask that you abide by the usual rules of decorum.
We’ll all be anxious to see if this really works, to get videos up on YouTube, to get the world busy on building this for their own homes and for their neighbors, creating jobs, providing hope, and getting out from under the corrupt powers that be.
Once we get verification, we can help prepare a set of clear plans for download for a small fee, to provide another revenue source for the inventor, shared also with PES, and with any affiliates who help disseminate it. PES can use that revenue to help compensate those who help with things like diagrams, parts lists, business tips, etc. And we can use the revenue to help other inventors move forward with their promising exotic free energy devices.
We’ll also ask that a small royalty (e.g. 5%) be paid for all commercial ventures that spring from the project, and we’ll split that with the inventor as well.
We want to prove to the world not only that exotic free energy is real, but that open sourcing is a great way to get it out to the world quickly, while rewarding the inventor well financially. Not all technologies are simple or cheap enough to open source, but for those that are, we want to demonstrate for the hesitant inventors that they can be rewarded financially better through open sourcing than from trying to break through all the barriers that the traditional method of taking a technology to market entails.
# # #
Links
- http://peswiki.com/index.php/OS:_Chain_Gravity_Machine – official project page
- http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chain-grav – new forum created
Source: http://pesn.com/2012/01/05/9602001_Free_Energy_Chain_Drive_Gravity_Machine_Open_Source_Project_Launched/
We’re busy working on a new global information platform to help the environmental movement. Please be patient while we create a solution for everyone to share, collect, organize and search for information related to ‘green’ products, services and solutions. Please feel free to leave a comment with suggestions or questions…
The time has come to move onto bigger and better things. This blog was a simple archive for news, and soon www.mrgreen.biz will become a community for environmentalists, politicians, citizens, organizations and eco-friendly corporations. Our unique concept and software platform has been designed from the ground up, and will include features to foster creativity and collaboration between us, our users, and the public.
This is not an easy task and we ask for your patience during the final phase of development. We will begin to call upon users to test beta features and help us improve before our public launch scheduled in 2012.
Please visit or bookmark www.mrgreen.biz or this blog frequently and stay tuned for updates!
Thank you everyone,
MrGreen.biz Administration
CBC – Fri, 17 Jun, 2011
The NDP is trying again to legislate stronger targets for reducing greenhouse gas emissions, reintroducing a bill that’s been twice defeated by the Senate.
The proposed law would set a long-term greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reduction target of 80 per cent below 1990 levels by 2050, and a medium-term target of 25 per cent below 1990 levels by 2020. It would also force the government to table with Parliament an interim target plan every five years.
Canada’s current target is based on the less-strict 2006 base level and seeks to reduce emissions 17 per cent by 2020.
The NDP’s most recent attemp made it through the House of Commons and to the Senate last fall as C-311, where it was defeated before making it to committee for study. It’s much less likely to make it that far this time, with a majority Conservative government poised to vote it down.
The government may argue it has to protect the oilsands but that industry isn’t Canada’s only economic driver, said NDP environment critic Megan Leslie.
“We have an oilsands worth of energy at our fingertips in energy efficiency. We have an oilsands worth of energy in renewables in this country. What we lack is the political will of this government to see these opportunities for what they are,” she said.
“They are opportunities to create jobs, they are opportunities to ensure our own energy security, and they are opportunities to meet our international climate change obligations.”
Leslie pointed to a recent OECD report, which she says reported the world has to choose between a green economy or none at all.
“This government continues to warn of the economic disaster that will occur if we take action on climate change and they continue to tell us that they’re shepherding us through this economic recovery, but they’re wrong,” she said.
A spokeswoman for Environment Minister Peter Kent says Canadians recently had an opportunity to consider the NDP’s climate change agenda, referring to the party’s second-place finish in the May 2 election.
“We look forward to the mandate given to us by the Canadian people to proceed with our plan to reduce GHG emissions in a sector by sector approach which will balance the environment and the economy,” she wrote in an email.
This FREE E-book emphasizes on the importance of green energy jobs in today’s situation by putting into picture the concept of green economy. Download it now!
© 2011 MrGreen.biz
The sun feels hotter
The clouds look darker
Storms rage stronger
Summer grows longer
Winter seams shorter
What’s with the weather?
It’s not the same as before
Society has declared war
A battle with our mother
Nature, we should adore
Nature, we should adore
How good was it before?
What’s with the weather?
Patterns become unsure
Chaos becomes mot du jour
It’s not the same as before
Do we blame global warming?
Or chemicals the planes are spraying?
Or maybe what the hippies keep saying,
Mother nature’s angry and raging…
What kind of world are we creating?
The climate is changing
There’s no time for debating
Stop all the blaming
Just look at the problems we’re facing
It’s not the same as before
Society has declared war
A battle with our mother
Nature, we should adore
How good was it before?
The sun feels hotter
The clouds look darker
Storms rage stronger
Summer grows longer
Winter seams shorter
What’s with the weather?
Do we blame global warming?
Or chemicals the planes are spraying?
Or maybe what the hippies keep saying,
Mother nature’s angry and raging…
What kind of world are we creating?
The climate is changing
There’s no time for debating
Stop all the blaming
Just look at the problems we’re facing
It’s not the same as before
Society has declared war
A battle with our mother
Nature, we should adore
How good was it before?
What’s with the weather?
By PROFESSOR ANGUS DALGLEISH
As a fair-haired Scot with freckles and pale skin I’m a classic case to be more at risk from melanoma. Getting quite badly sunburned on my nose years ago in Spain has pushed my risk up further.
To say I’ve been wary about the sun is an understatement – I specialise in treating patients with advanced melanoma, a deadly form of skin cancer.
I was also in Australia 30 years ago at the start of the Slip-Slop-Slap campaign to warn people to keep out of the sun, and for seven years I never went swimming without being covered in sun lotion and wearing a T-shirt.
Soak up the sun: Your skin needs vitamin D
But now I believe that rather than reducing the risk of skin cancer, following these sun-avoidance guidelines could actually raise it. That’s because we need sun on our skin to make vitamin D – ironically these campaigns may have made millions chronically short of it and put them at risk. t rather than reducing the risk of skin cancer, following these sun-avoidance guidelines could actually raise it.
That’s because we need sun on our skin to make vitamin D – ironically these campaigns may have made millions chronically short of it and put them at risk. The sun’s effects might even protect against melanoma (as reported in the Mail earlier this month).
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-1390243/Sun-CAN-protect-skin-cancer.html#ixzz1Oc4Hxng2
Recent Comments